Sponsored by

Hey, PrideNomad!

👉 Was this forwarded to you? Be sure to receive our next issue. Sign up here. It's free!

Today's PrideNomad™ Quiz:

In Today's Email:

Destinations: Two videos told me I could have an EU passport without ever living in Europe, and both were telling the truth
Nomad Hack: The distinction that makes five-year passport plans fall apart
Destinations: The Dutch door that genuinely is open, and it isn't the one they're pointing at
Ground Truth: We got something wrong two weeks ago, and I'm changing how this newsletter works because of it

Happy Tuesday.

I want to start with a confession, because it makes the rest of this easier to trust.

Last week I watched a video that told me I could hold a European passport without ever living in Europe. Open a company on a Caribbean island. Become a resident. Wait five years. Collect a Dutch passport, with the full run of the EU behind it.

And I sat there thinking: why doesn't everyone know about this?

I have spent years telling people to check the fine print, and my first reaction was to reach for my calendar.

So I did what I should have done first. I went and read the actual rules.

What I found was bad enough that I'm filming a full breakdown of it this week, which will be on the YouTube channel shortly. Today is the short version: the two things those videos left out, and what they cost you.

DESTINATIONS:

Both Videos Were Telling the Truth. Neither Told the Whole Truth.

First, the pitch deserves its due, because most of it holds up.

Curaçao really is a country inside the Kingdom of the Netherlands. There is no separate "Curaçao citizenship." Naturalize there and you become a Dutch national, and Dutch nationality really does carry full EU citizenship, even though Curaçao itself sits outside the EU. Five years of legal residence really is the baseline. (Source: the Dutch immigration service, IND.)

All true. Every word.

Here's the sentence that appears in neither video.

The Netherlands generally requires you to give up the nationality you already have.

Not as a formality. As a condition. Fail to do it and the IND can revoke the Dutch nationality it just granted you. (Source: IND, "Renouncing your nationality.")

There's an exceptions list. I read the whole thing. There is no American exception, and I went looking for one because I wanted there to be one.

So the thing being sold as a second passport is not a second passport.

It's a trade-in.

Some people genuinely want that trade. But it's a different product from the one in the thumbnail, and you should know which one you're buying before you spend five years paying for it.

The smaller omission surprised me more.

One video says the test covers "basic Dutch language skills." The IND says that in Curaçao you sit it in Dutch and Papiamentu, A2 minimum in each.

So the route may require learning not one language but two. The first one got a passing mention. The second, Papiamentu, appears in neither video.

That's not a knock on Papiamentu. It's a knock on people who'll sell you a five-year plan without once thinking about what your Tuesday nights look like inside it.

And the question I actually started with, which neither video answered.

How much of the five years must you physically be there? I could not find an official Curaçao rule promising that any specific number of days automatically preserves your naturalization clock. The governing idea is genuine residence, meaning where your life is actually based, not a residence card kept warm with occasional visits.

That's the figure the whole pitch turns on, and nobody selling it will tell you what it is.

Then there's the part that makes the strategy fragile. The rules move.

The Dutch cabinet has sent a proposal into the legislative process to take naturalization from five years to ten. It still has to clear consultation, the Council of State and parliament, and the number today is still five. (Source: Dutch immigration counsel tracking the proposal.)

We know how that bet goes, because Portugal just ran it. Applications filed from 19 May 2026 face seven years, or ten for most nationalities. (Source: the amended Portuguese nationality law.)

Every video still telling Americans "Portugal, five years, EU passport" is now wrong for anyone starting now. Not dishonest. Just old. Which is its own kind of expensive.

Including, and I won't bury this, a line in this newsletter two weeks ago. More on that below.

And now the question that has nothing to do with law.

Say all of it worked, and say you made peace with handing back the American passport.

Would you want the life?

I know what year three feels like on a small island, and it is not what year one feels like. St. Croix, in my case, not Curaçao. The postcard part is real. So is the moment at a party when you realize you've already met everyone. Curaçao has about 150,000 people, and the queer slice of that is the community you'd actually be joining, not the one in the tourism footage.

I also have to be honest about our own numbers here, because I nearly wasn't.

Same-sex marriage is legal in Curaçao, upheld by the Dutch Supreme Court on 12 July 2024. That's real. But it's one dimension, and in our own 2025 Index Curaçao ranks 56th of 65: rights 3 out of 10, safety 5, social acceptance 4. You can check it at PrideNomad.com/index, which is rather the point of publishing it.

Marriage equality removed the objection I'd have led with two years ago. It did not make Curaçao a place our own research recommends.

So my hesitation isn't danger. It's the gap between one good law and the whole environment, with the scale on top.

Nobody in the passport business draws that distinction, because they're selling documents. You'd be buying five years of your life.

NOMAD HACK:

Two Applications, Not One

There's a distinction buried in the Portugal change that almost nobody makes, and getting it wrong is what makes these five-year plans fall apart.

Applying for residence and applying for citizenship are two different applications, years apart.

Portugal's transition rules kept the old regime in place for citizenship procedures already pending when the new law took effect on 19 May 2026. That helped people who had already done the five years and reached the application stage. It did nothing for anyone still at the beginning, holding a residence permit, counting.

Which means the honest version of "five years to citizenship" is: five years of residence, and then an application under whatever the law says on the day you finally submit it. Not the law on the day you moved. Not the law in the video you watched.

The years in between are the exposure, and nobody selling you a five-year timeline is pricing that in.

So the move is to ask four questions about any country before you build a life around its passport:

What has actually been enacted, as opposed to proposed? When does it take effect? Who exactly do its transition rules protect? And is the residence itself worth having if the citizenship rules change while I'm living there?

That last one is the whole thing. The Netherlands baseline is still five consecutive years of legal residence, and the cabinet has sent a proposal into the legislative process to raise it to ten. It has to clear consultation, the Council of State and parliament. Nobody starting today can honestly tell you which rule will govern their application in 2031.

That doesn't make the route worthless. It makes the passport a possibility rather than a product with a delivery date.

Choose a residence you'd still want if the passport never came. If the answer is no, the passport was doing all the work, and passports are the one part of this you don't control.

I'm 63 With $1.5M. Can I Spend $10K a Month?

You’ve saved $1.5 million. Now comes the real test.

Can it produce $10,000 a month, or will that pace drain your portfolio?

Most retirees do not get a clear answer until it is too late.

The issue is not just how much you have. It is whether your portfolio was built to pay you, not just grow.

That difference can determine whether your money lasts decades or starts breaking down early.

Sequence of returns, taxes on withdrawals, healthcare costs, and whether the 4% rule still applies all play a role.

Fiduciary advisors created a breakdown showing what drives sustainable income and why the same $1.5M can produce very different outcomes.

If you have $1M or more invested, do not guess.

See How Long My Money Lasts

Learn More

DESTINATIONS:

There Is a Dutch Door That's Actually Open. It's Just Not the One They're Pointing At.

Here's the part that gets me.

Both videos lean on a real treaty, the Dutch-American Friendship Treaty of 1956. DAFT. And DAFT genuinely is one of the most underused things available to Americans.

They found a real door. They just aimed everyone at the wrong room.

DAFT doesn't get you a Dutch passport. It gets you the right to live in the Netherlands, which for a lot of people reading this was the actual goal all along.

DAFT can give qualifying American entrepreneurs a comparatively accessible route to a Dutch self-employment permit: a €4,500 investment held in a Dutch business account, 25% minimum ownership, working for yourself rather than for an employer. First permit runs two years and renews while you still qualify. No labor market test, no sponsorship, no job offer. (Source: IND and Dutch immigration counsel; confirm current figures with the IND before filing.)

Note what's absent. Nobody asks for your American passport, because you never naturalize. You're a resident, not a citizen.

That's the trade almost nobody explains: citizenship is permanent, inheritable and expensive. Residence is renewable, reversible and available now. If what you want is to wake up in Amsterdam, residence does that without waiting to become a citizen at all.

One thing plainly, because a visa route is not the same as a welcome.

The Netherlands was the first country in the world to open marriage to same-sex couples, in 2001, and it ranks 2nd of 65 in our own 2025 Index with rights at 10 out of 10.

And reports of discrimination and violence against LGBTI+ people there are up 81% since 2022, reaching 4,800 in 2025. In that same year the Public Prosecution Service recorded six convictions for LGBTI+ discrimination. (Sources: NL Times on the reporting figures; Public Prosecution Service report of 15 April 2026. Those two numbers count different things, since a violent assault is prosecuted as assault rather than as discrimination, so treat them as two separate signals rather than a conviction rate.) COC Nederland calls the trend extremely worrying and says the enforcement response is nowhere near the scale of it.

Best legal framework in Europe. Streets getting harder. Both true, same country, and you should carry both.

Which is the whole reason residence beats citizenship as a first move. You get to find out before you commit.

And Portugal has another trap waiting for couples, one that has nothing to do with citizenship.

WATCH THIS WEEK:

Moving to Portugal as an LGBTQ Couple? This Requirement Catches Everyone Off Guard

If Portugal is still on your list after everything above, this is the requirement that catches couples out, and it has nothing to do with the citizenship timeline. It's the income maths once there are two of you, plus what unmarried partners have to prove that married ones don't.

Recorded in July. Which, as this issue has been at pains to point out, is a date worth knowing.

GROUND TRUTH:

We Got Portugal Wrong. Here's What I Want to Do About It.

In mapmaking, ground truth means data verified by someone standing in the actual place rather than inferred from a distance. It's the correction a satellite can't make for itself.

So: two weeks ago we described Portugal's D8 as putting new applicants on a five-year path to citizenship. That was wrong. Under the law in force since 19 May 2026 the standard period is ten years for most applicants and seven for EU and CPLP nationals. Citizenship applications already pending when it took effect stayed under the old rules, which is why the old line was true for some people and not for any reader starting now.

Nobody wrote in about it. I'm glad we caught it ourselves, but catching it after publication is still catching it late. Verifying before we publish is our job, not yours. What your ground truth gives us is a second line of defense.

Because here's what this publication has that no database or AI can replicate on its own: a few thousand of you are standing in the countries the rest of us are only reading about. You're at the consulate window when the form changes. You know which "welcoming" city gets uncomfortable eight streets from the center.

So the invitation is permanent from today.

I'm not going to manufacture a correction every Tuesday to fill a box. But when there's something worth printing, it goes here, and if it's a correction it goes here with your name on it. Not buried. In the issue, where the mistake was. And it doesn't have to be a correction: a fee that moved, a number that wasn't what you were charged, a place we were too cautious about that's genuinely fine.

Just hit reply. It comes to me, and I read every one. That's not a line I'm using because it sounds good. It lands at [email protected] and I read every ticket there. I have for years.

One sentence is plenty, and "I think you're wrong about this" is a perfectly good opening line. I'm at the Fringe until the 14th and in London after, so I may be slow. I won't be absent.

Where a correction affects a country's standing it goes into the Index rescore, which means one of you noticing something on a Tuesday changes what the map says for everyone else.

That's the version of this I actually want to build. Not an audience. A few thousand people with better eyes than mine, in more places than I can be.

Inaugural correction, PN 228, 21 July 2026: Portugal D8 described as a five-year citizenship path for someone beginning now. Corrected above. Caught in-house, after publication.

Answer to Today's Quiz

Know someone who's been sending you passport videos? Forward this to them before they book anything.

FINAL THOUGHT:

There's a reason courtrooms make you swear to three separate things.

The truth. The whole truth. And nothing but the truth.

They're not the same promise. You can clear the first and the third completely and still leave someone with a picture of the world that costs them five years.

So when someone hands you a plan, ask what they left out. It's usually one page deep, and it usually changes the answer.

Because almost nothing that misleads you in this business is a lie. It's an omission, delivered with enormous confidence, by somebody selling something on the next slide.

Update the map. Then decide.

See you Friday for Latitude, from Edinburgh.

— Ken 🌈